Don Marti

Sun 17 Apr 2005 08:33:51 PM PDT

DRM: does Hollywood really care?

Probably the best-known example of a DRM circumvention was the publication of information on how to descramble CSS-encoded DVDs. On November 1, 1999, Wired reported, "The worst fear of movie studios has been realized: DVD movie encryption has been broken."

Did this worst fear actually have any effect on DVD release schedules?

The top grossing movies for 1998, before CSS descrambling became widely known, took about a year to come out in DVD format.

                    USA theatrical
Title               release        DVD          Days
----------------------------------------------------
Saving Private Ryan 24 Jul 1998    2 Nov 1999   566
Armageddon           1 Jul 1998    5 Jan 1999   176
There's Something   15 Jul 1998    3 Aug 1999   384 
  About Mary
A Bug's Life        25 Nov 1998   23 Nov 1999   363
The Waterboy         6 Nov 1998   21 Oct 1999   348
----------------------------------------------------
Average                                         367

But what happened in 2000, when CSS removal was common knowledge, at least if you read certain technical publications? The top five Top grossing movies for 2000 actually came out sooner after theatrical release.

                    USA theatrical
Title               release        DVD          Days
----------------------------------------------------
How the Grinch      17 Nov 2000    20 Nov 2001  368
  Stole Christmas
Cast Away           22 Dec 2000     6 Dec 2001  349
Mission:            24 May 2000    11 Dec 2000  201 
  Impossible II
Gladiator            5 May 2000    21 Nov 2000  200
What Women Want     15 Dec 2000     8 May 2001  144
----------------------------------------------------
Average                                         252

2003 is an key year, either the low point if you're worrying about loss of control over customers or a high point if you're a DVD customer. DVD X Copy for Microsoft Windows went on sale December 03, 2002 and wasn't taken off the market until February 20, 2004.

So, is there any difference in DVD release dates between the top grossing movies of 2002, when DVD access was still only for people who know their way around a C compiler, and later? Let's see. Here's 2002:

                    USA theatrical
Title               release        DVD          Days
----------------------------------------------------
Spider-Man           3 May 2002     1 Nov 2002  182
The Lord of the     18 Dec 2002    26 Aug 2003  250 
  Rings: The Two Towers
Star Wars: Episode  16 May 2002    12 Nov 2002  180
  II Attack of the Clones
Harry Potter and    15 Nov 2002    11 Apr 2003  146 
  the Chamber of Secrets
My Big Fat Greek     2 Aug 2002    11 Feb 2003  193 
  Wedding
----------------------------------------------------
Average                                         190

Now, with that point-and-click circumvention tool available to so many customers, wouldn't the top grossing movies of 2003 stay out of DVD format until the coast was clear? Nope. 2003 showed the quickest turnarounds yet.

                    USA theatrical
Title               release        DVD          Days
----------------------------------------------------
The Lord of the     17 Dec 2003    25 May 2004  159
  Rings: The Return 
  of the King
Finding Nemo        30 May 2003     4 Nov 2003  158
Pirates of the       9 Jul 2003     2 Dec 2003  146
  Caribbean: The Curse 
  of the Black Pearl
The Matrix Reloaded 15 May 2003    14 Oct 2003  152
Bruce Almighty      23 May 2003    25 Nov 2003  186
----------------------------------------------------
Average                                         160

There is a possible interpretation that DVDs are coming out earlier in order to compete with infringing copies. But where are the infringing copies coming from? If customer ability to copy DVDs mattered, delaying DVD release would matter. But it doesn't seem to. DRM in media sold to customers is increasingly looking like a noisy, pointless sideshow to a real infringement problem.

For the studios, backing DRM and technology mendates only alienates the technical constituencies that are first of all, sticklers for conventional copyright law, and second, qualified to develop effective policies and technology to enforce it.