Don Marti

Wed, 15 Mar 2006

Classes of advertising

Just thinking about the problem of matching up buyers and sellers (having read Doc's The Intention Economy) and it seems like it's a mistake to lump all advertising together. Why not treat advertising that gives differently from advertising that takes?

Class A: some of what the advertiser pays goes to pay for something that's valuable to the audience: magazine ads, Google AdWords.

Class B: the advertising pays its own way, but doesn't fund something of value to the audience: direct mail, billboard on private property.

Class C: the advertising imposes costs on the audience: email spam, vandalism such as spray-painting sidewalks and putting up "vertical litter" signs.

As a potential customer, when I see class C, I'll do my best to block it, and class B I mostly ignore, but put up some Class A and you're starting off with the message that you're funding something I want to read, and that's a good start.

--
Don Marti <dmarti@zgp.org>

This banner is hidden from standards-compliant browsers. If you can see the banner, consider switching browsers.

photodropper DirectBuy Yahoo TMDA Lexmark Linux news from LinuxWorld.com Scientology AdTI SSH SCO CP2102 Linux Herbalife Jerry Reynolds VX30 PowerPoint Matt Harrison nutzwerk intelligent design Eaton Powerware