Dijjer and Freenet (RE: [p2p-hackers] clustering)
gbildson at limepeer.com
Mon Mar 20 18:33:43 UTC 2006
Define "most". If you mean more than 70% (not sure of the exact
percentage), I would have to disagree.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: p2p-hackers-bounces at zgp.org [mailto:p2p-hackers-bounces at zgp.org]On
> Behalf Of Daniel Stutzbach
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:29 PM
> To: Peer-to-peer development.
> Subject: Re: Dijjer and Freenet (RE: [p2p-hackers] clustering)
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:20:02AM -0800, Serguei Osokine wrote:
> > You mean you did not expect to grow Dijjer and Freenet beyond
> > 512K nodes before you'd have to replace all the client code? With
> > today's P2P network sizes it might be a good idea to have the code
> > that would be ready to scale into high millions at least - you never
> > know when you might need it... :-)
> Most users upgrade their software within 2 months , so replacing
> all the client code actually isn't that hard. I'm assuming the
> network is robust enough to keep working if a small percentage of
> clients have the old code.
>  = based on measurements of LimeWire Ultrapeer users. Amir
> H. Rasti, Daniel Stutzbach, Reza Rejaie, "On the Long-term Evolution
> of the Two-Tier Gnutella Overlay", to appear at the Global Internet
> Symposium 2006.
> Daniel Stutzbach Computer Science Ph.D Student
> http://www.barsoom.org/~agthorr University of Oregon
> p2p-hackers mailing list
> p2p-hackers at zgp.org
> Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences:
More information about the P2p-hackers