[p2p-hackers] Re: Identify "defective" nodes

[Lemon Obrien]

i do this by using info from ping/pong....u have to ping nodes to kep the udp channel open.../even relay stations have to ping nodes behind firewalls....so...say, after X number of pings and no pong from the application....the reference is removed.

Greg Bildson <gbildson at limepeer.com> wrote:  The train was full of ideas and enlightenment. It wasn't necessarily full
of an implementation imperative. :-)

Thanks
-greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: p2p-hackers-bounces at zgp.org [mailto:p2p-hackers-bounces at zgp.org]On
> Behalf Of Raphael Manfredi
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:35 PM
> To: p2p-hackers at zgp.org
> Subject: [p2p-hackers] Re: Identify "defective" nodes
>
>
> Quoting Sam Berlin from ml.p2p.hackers:
> :I don't think Credence has released any specs yet? If they have,
> :that'd be nice. I'm sure they have the code available on their site
> :though.
>
> OK, then it explains why I "missed the train", as Greg said.
> No specs, no inter-operable implementations accross Gnutella servents.
>
> Although I can reverse-engineer Java, there's no way I'm going to
> do it on code that could evolve at any time in the future, since no
> specs are published.
>
> Raphael


_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers at zgp.org
http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences:
http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences



You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
Lemon Obrien, the Third.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zgp.org/pipermail/p2p-hackers/attachments/20060228/150a5a15/attachment.htm