[p2p-hackers] Real-world UPnP stats
Alex Pankratov
ap at hamachi.cc
Tue Apr 25 19:24:34 UTC 2006
David Barrett wrote:
> Yikes, that's pretty bad. Did you also capture which fraction of clients
> report that UPnP works at all?
Not sure I follow. How would you define these clients ?
> We use UPnP but aren't currently tuned to
> capture this information, though I'll plan to in the future.
>
> When building your UPnP layer, did you find that the various routers were
> faithful to the spec, or was there a lot of tweaking for specific NAT
> vendors?
No, not much tweaking at all .. One thing that was evident is a
difference in response time. For example some Linksys models may
take up to 5 seconds to respond to AddPortMapping request.
More information about the P2p-hackers
mailing list