[p2p-hackers] Bounty for Open Source Trust System

Kevin Walsh kwalsh at cs.cornell.edu
Wed Apr 12 04:15:24 UTC 2006

I certainly agree that there are drawbacks to Credence's approach, as any.
And our papers try to discuss some of them. But I don't think that is what 
you meant by "well documented". If you could send me (or the listserv) 
some pointers or references, I'd be happy to see them. We are always 
interested in potential improvements, weaknesses, or other approaches to 
similar problems of trust in p2p networks.


On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, coderman wrote:
> credence requires explicit user feedback and provides a very one
> dimensional view of reputation.  the drawbacks to this approach (while
> still much better than nothing) are well documented.

More information about the P2p-hackers mailing list