[p2p-hackers] Hard question....

Matthew Kaufman matthew at matthew.at
Sun Apr 2 03:47:53 UTC 2006

gbildson at limepeer.com:
> I'm gonna go with _no_.  The amount of time it is saturated 
> is just a blip.

I'm going with "no" as well. And note that my previous note about computing
bandwidth based on accurate RTT and accurate window calculation assumes that
you have enough pending data that you are actively driving the window to
maximum size and probing for loss. If not, then you'll just calculate your
(lower) actual consumed bandwidth.

Matthew Kaufman
matthew at matthew.at

More information about the P2p-hackers mailing list