[p2p-hackers] State of GNUnet 0.7.0 (Re: p2p framework)
Bram Neijt
bneijt at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 12:07:22 UTC 2005
Hi. everybody.
I'm just beginning at looking into P2P and started a side-line
project. However, I have future dreams to develop a P2P client for
distributed 3D data sharing, distributed IRC and a community/mail
system.
So, I'm also looking for a framework. Now I'm not out for speed, but
am looking for: secure and annonymous but identifiable clients.
Although I'm not really content with the gnunetd server, I though
GNUnet would be a good candidate. Because I'll probably work out my
own library (C++ fan) it's more the core protocol I'm worried about.
Any suggestions on where to focus my attention?
Greetings,
Bram
PS This is a reply on this part of an earlier message:
On 11/30/05, Matthias Fischmann <fis at wiwi.hu-berlin.de> wrote:
> a few remarks:
> - GNUnet: i had a look at it a while ago and my estimate then was
> that it would die away. too many design decisions are interwoven
> in too much an ad-hoc fashion. some of those decisions (crypto
> issues, the overlay topology, etc.) have become obsolete, but
> cannot be replaced without breaking the whole thing. i myself
> can't see any reason for ever touching it again.
More information about the P2p-hackers
mailing list