[p2p-hackers] UDP Keep-alive
eugen at leitl.org
Tue Jan 11 21:13:48 UTC 2005
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:01:33PM -0800, coderman wrote:
> Most NAT's appear to give a 1-5 minute timeout since last
> packet seen. It would be nice to find a market summary of
> various NAT behaviors. Anyone know of such a thing?
Here's a data point: I've spent the better part of the day trying to remove
default NAT (60 sec TCP, 180 sec UDP) idle connection decay from a Draytek
Vigor 2900G with latest firmware.
To no avail, had to send email to support (probably, /dev/null).
Proprietary NAT boxes are evil, period.
Which reminds me (since I've got my IPv6 subnet approved a few days ago):
what's p2p application situation for IPv6? Can anyone give a brief summary?
> The timeout is trivial to avoid with loose UDP NAT (simply
> send / recv a packet from any peer within the few minute
> window). For symmetric NAT it is more of a pain. Each
> session must send traffic within the timeout window which
> raises overall communication significantly for large numbers
> of logical NAT-UDP connections.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://zgp.org/pipermail/p2p-hackers/attachments/20050111/47efff35/attachment.pgp
More information about the P2p-hackers