[p2p-hackers] Re: scalability
Daniel Stutzbach
agthorr at cs.uoregon.edu
Fri Dec 2 20:22:23 UTC 2005
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:15:45PM -0500, Bryan Turner wrote:
> Gnutella (I believe) doesn't meet #2,3 and partially #4,5:
> #2 because it does not cluster related data it will eventually
> be overwhelmed with content.
> #3 because it performs full-file transfers instead of block
> exchanges or partial file transfers
> #4/5 because clients don't immediately offer partial downloads,
> thus hot spots have a congestion delay measured in
> full-file-transfer increments rather than in block
> increments (an order of 2 for typical MP3s, easily
> reaching multiple days of congestion).
If I am not mistaken, Gnutella has been doing partial file transfers
for two or three years now. The eDonkey/eMule network does this too.
BitTorrent does not have a monopoly on this feature. :-)
The relevant spec (if it can be called a spec) for Gnutella is here:
http://www.the-gdf.org/wiki/index.php?title=Partial_File_Sharing_Protocol
--
Daniel Stutzbach Computer Science Ph.D Student
http://www.barsoom.org/~agthorr University of Oregon
More information about the P2p-hackers
mailing list