[p2p-hackers] BitTorrent measurements / fully decentralized
list-p2phack at ruffledpenguin.org
Wed Dec 15 19:23:02 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 10:19 -0800, Martin Peck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:41:55 -0800, Adam Lydick
> <list-p2phack at ruffledpenguin.org> wrote:
> > ...
> > Perhaps not the best possible world, but why not a decentralized model
> > that is enhanced by (but does not require) a centralized authority? This
> > seems to work fairly well for a number of existing networks.
> It is usually very easy to move from a fully decentralized model to a
> more centralized one. It is much harder to go the other direction.
> My point is that you need a fully decentralized system to avoid the
> weaknesses / vulnerabilities associated with a central identity server
> (CA, single signon, social net sites, etc). I agree that it would be
> useful to support other systems as well, though they would not be the
> base upon which identity is built, but rather augment the
> decentralized identities within the system...
I completely agree with that. My reply was poorly worded, as it implied
that the central portion should be "designed in". As you noted, this
would be unwise.
More information about the P2p-hackers