[linux-elitists] How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?

Rik van Riel riel at surriel.com
Thu May 26 12:21:22 PDT 2016


On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 01:40 -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > 
> > It's more of a do-ocracy here, with the decisions
> > being made by each individual package that either goes
> > systemd-dependent or maintains support for running
> > under other init systems.
> 
> 
> not any more it is not, if it had ever been.  Systemd was
> developed by paid employees as part of their job.

Wait, so having somebody paid to work on systemd
files is bad, but not having somebody paid to 
work on the shell scripts that you like to use
instead is also bad?

Developers of any upstream project have a choice
where to put their efforts. If they choose to
support one style init system and not another,
that is their choice to make.

-- 
All rights reversed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20160526/9be130cd/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-elitists mailing list