[linux-elitists] How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
list+elite at nodns4.us
Mon May 16 15:08:58 PDT 2016
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 01:26:34PM -0700, Don Marti wrote:
> begin /dev/rob0 quotation of Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:46:27AM -0500:
> > Nevertheless, systemd is making it difficult for GNU/Linux
> > distributors to continue without systemd. You [Greg] mentioned
> > Slackware upthread, and I know that Slackware is feeling the
> > pinch. I'm sure that's directly related to the unusually long
> > time we're seeing since the previous Slackware release.
> It's not systemd making it difficult for distributions
> to continue without systemd. It's upstream software
> (for a good example, see the "hplip" package in
> Rick's article.)
Yes, you are right, and in fact I started thinking about that word
choice right after sending. Thanks for the clarification.
> * Package has some random init-related problem.
> * Someone writes or contributes a systemd-related
> * Nobody has any real issues with the solution.
> * The package comes to depend on systemd.
> Hard to argue with, since it means that the package
> maintainers are now maintaining one line in a systemd
> unit file instead of some shell script, so they can
> spend more time on work that solves problems for
> their users.
More information about the linux-elitists