[linux-elitists] Spam filters
Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)
shot at hot.pl
Sat Mar 28 12:44:36 PDT 2009
> Hiding isn't an anti-spam panacea but, wonderfully enlightening
> discussions of anti-spam flavor-of-the-month aside, what is?
An email admin with a clue – either you should
be one or your email provider should have one.
Seriously, if I get an email service from anyone, I expect them to
filter the spam for me (ideally, as an option), much like I expect
the postal service not to let random people put advertisements in my
mailbox. I’ve been told Gmail does quite a good job in this department,
so it’s not impossible to do.
> It's really not that hard to see why some non-elitists try it, and
> not that hard to make a case that there are ways, sadly imperfect,
> impermanent, incomplete and otherwise pathetic ways (like so much else
> in human existence) in which it works for some people.
I agree it might work for some people some of the time. My point is
that email hiding does have its vices, and in my opinion they greatly
outweight its virtues – my well-hidden email address was maliciously
put on a spammer’s list once, so I learned this lesson the hard way.
Hiding means you make it harder for others to use your email address
(which is, IMHO, a total failure in itself) while not giving you the
advantages you think it gives in the long run.
vegetarian, n.: a person who, due to malnutrition caused by poor lifestyle
choices, is eight times more likely to catch TB than a normal person.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the linux-elitists