[linux-elitists] So, Microsoft spent that good will already.

Greg Folkert greg at gregfolkert.net
Tue Jul 28 08:10:52 PDT 2009

On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 09:49 -0700, Rick Moen wrote:

Ohhhh, Riickyyy... you got some 'splainin' to do, Ricky!

Since the SFLC says that Microsoft had already violated (and was in
violation of) the GPLv2 and came into compliance when it released the 20

Please explain your view since it contradicts with *REAL* Lawyers. I
await your tutelage.
greg at gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
Alternate Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA  29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20090728/f05cfc6e/attachment.pgp>

More information about the linux-elitists mailing list