[linux-elitists] FAT is the new GIF?
Thu Feb 26 17:13:09 PST 2009
2009/2/27 Jason Spence <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:56:02AM +0000, Dave Crossland wrote:
>> 2009/2/27 Jason Spence <email@example.com>:
>> > the only motivation I can think of would
>> > be Microsoft demanding higher license fees for FAT implementations.
>> Maybe I've misunderstood the lawsuit, but er, isn't that what just started?
> [higher than] $250,000 per [distributor]
Doesn't higher than $0 per distributor chill free software?
More information about the linux-elitists