[linux-elitists] [Opensim-dev] Mono considered harmful
eugen at leitl.org
Sat Apr 4 07:19:14 PDT 2009
IANAL, does below explanation by Adam hold water?
----- Forwarded message from "Frisby, Adam" <adam at deepthink.com.au> -----
From: "Frisby, Adam" <adam at deepthink.com.au>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:36:58 -0400
To: "mike.dickson at hp.com" <mike.dickson at hp.com>,
"opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de" <opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de>
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Mono considered harmful
Reply-To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
Since this discussion is raised every 6 months without fail, I present:
Written the last time this came up.
* ECMA standardisation forbids MS from suing implementers.
* C# and its standard library are ECMA standards.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
> bounces at lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Mike Dickson
> Sent: Friday, 3 April 2009 9:00 AM
> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Mono considered harmful
> Then go pick some other platform to work on. OpenSim seems pretty
> solidly committed to the C#/Mono choice it made when it was started.
> And yes, of course my argument is speculation. Unless you have a
> crystal ball and know for certain you're going to get sued how can it
> anything but that.
> Companies use patents for leverage all the time. In this day and age
> that's probably their highest value (fwiw, I personally don't believe
> software patents are a good thing, or even sensible, copyright law
> more appropriate to me).
> Seriously, all I was saying is this is a storm in a teacup. It
> stop useful work from getting done. Or cloud the excellent work that's
> been done to date.
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 15:49 +0000, Nebadon Izumi wrote:
> > your argument is 100% speculation and not based in any facts sorry to
> > say, you can assume all you like, doesnt make what your saying true.
> > Neb
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:13:47AM -0500, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > won't go into details) the worst case scenarios is that
> > you'd not be
> > > able to run it on Linux using Mono. If you're inclined
> > towards floating
> > So you're saying the worst case (which is I think is arguably
> > likely, actually) is that OpenSim only runs on proprietary
> > systems.
> > OpenSim becoming Windows-only, eventually.
> > > anxiety then this is something to worry about. Otherwise
> > from an OpenSim
> > > perspective there are bigger fish to fry. Like getting to
> > 1.0...
> > Becoming ghetto and then long-term insignificant is less
> > important
> > than getting 1.0 out of the door. Mmmh, okay. If you say so.
> > --
> > Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
> > http://leitl.org
> > ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com
> > http://postbiota.org
> > 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensim-dev mailing list
> > Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
> > --
> > Nebadon Izumi @ http://osgrid.org
> Mike Dickson <mike.dickson at hp.com>
> BladeSystem infrastructure R&D
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
----- End forwarded message -----
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the linux-elitists