[linux-elitists] [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: FW: Ruben Safir - Computer Misuse]
Karsten M. Self
Tue Oct 23 15:42:39 PDT 2007
on Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 01:49:43AM -0400, Ruben Safir (email@example.com) wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS <firstname.lastname@example.org> -----
> X-UIDL: FBg!!VmO!!A9Z"!Wgh!!
> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 19:55:04 -0400
> From: Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS <email@example.com>
> several email addresses removed
> Subject: Re: FW: Ruben Safir - Computer Misuse
> In-Reply-To: <17CD5D4D4A764A41B056E3583019773104C704@EXCHANGE>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on www2.mrbrklyn.com
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
> X-UID: 36144
> Friendly Director(name removed) and all
> I want to make this every clear to everyone involved, so there is no
> misunderstanding. I've spent the last 4 months cleaning those insecure
> computers from key stroke capture programs, viruses, adware and spyware
> for several months. The computer which died today, I spend 4 hours of my
> own time to resurect a hard drive which failed, most likely
> due to the dust and dirt and the fact that those machines are on the
> floor and old.
<... snippage ...>
While it may come as a shock to some, that email exemplifies a number of
characteristics not uncommon in business organizations:
- An individual with good technical, but relatively poor tactical and
political skills, getting involved in a technical problem.
- Persons working outside their employment scope. My understanding is
that Ruben was hired as a pharmacist, not an IT tech.
- A rabidly paranoid and dysfunctional organization. As DM's followup
suggests, exposing the company's internal flaws may have been one of
the few vaguely satisfying outcomes possible. Even that is a step
which should be taken with care.
What I've seen, both past and present, in a great many IT situations is
a failure to secure critical buy-in, particularly within disfunctional
organizations, before taking "radical" steps. Linux is far more
accepted in industry today than even 2-3 years ago. Lord knows, it's
critical infrastruction in a great many places, many of which aren't
even fully aware of the fact.
Have I been bitten by similar paranoia? Sure. Am I cautious in what I
recommend. Yes. Do I continue to quietly build support for what I
think are valid, useful, and defensible choices for IT based on Free
Software solutions? You bet.
The game is political.
Oddly enough, I seem to have read that on a sig somewhere recently.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://linuxmafia.com/~karsten
Ceterum censeo, Caldera delenda est.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20071023/1a28f03c/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists