[linux-elitists] wtf is "public domain"?
Thu Nov 8 11:32:19 PST 2007
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:47:12AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 13:32 -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:51:21AM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> > > There was also some 2005 kerfuffle about Dan allegedly... dodging
> > > concerning a problem with integer handling on 64-bit platforms -- fixed
> > > in netqmail. http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html addresses that claim
> > > from Dan's perspective.
> > I love the quote
> > In May 2005, Georgi Guninski claimed that some potential 64-bit portability
> > problems allowed a ``remote exploit in qmail-smtpd.'' This claim is denied.
> > Nobody gives gigabytes of memory to each qmail-smtpd process, so there is no
> > problem with qmail's assumption that allocated array lengths fit comfortably
> > into 32 bits.
> I've been *THROWN* into dealing with systems setup by someone that
> ABSOLUTELY LOVES DJB's software.
That somes it up...
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://fairuse.nylxs.com DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
"Yeah - I write Free Software...so SUE ME"
"The tremendous problem we face is that we are becoming sharecroppers to our own cultural heritage -- we need the ability to participate in our own society."
"> I'm an engineer. I choose the best tool for the job, politics be damned.<
You must be a stupid engineer then, because politcs and technology have been attached at the hip since the 1st dynasty in Ancient Egypt. I guess you missed that one."
© Copyright for the Digital Millennium
More information about the linux-elitists