[linux-elitists] Remember Reply-to munging? Whatever happened to that?

Don Marti dmarti@zgp.org
Sun Jul 8 22:11:47 PDT 2007

begin Teh Entar-Nick quotation of Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:39:08AM +0100:

> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
> > A long time ago, Chip Rosenthal wrote a fine document entitled
> > ‘Reply-To’ Munging Considered Harmful.
> [...]
> > In 2000 (or maybe earlier), Simon Hill wrote a response called
> > Reply-To Munging Considered Useful, which is frequently offered as a
> > rebuttal to Chip’s document in online debates.
> [...]
> > People still using these two documents to debate the issue are wasting
> > everybody’s time. The issue was definitively settled in 2001, and Chip
> > won.

Mailman died off silently again.  Setting up a cron
job to kick it nightly unless anyone has any better

    dmarti@allium:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/mailman stop
    Stopping Mailman master qrunner: mailmanctlNo child with pid: 387
    [Errno 3] No such process
    Stale pid file removed.
    dmarti@allium:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/mailman start
    Starting Mailman master qrunner: mailmanctl.

Don Marti                    

More information about the linux-elitists mailing list