[linux-elitists] Editor Emeritus... wishing it was still Editor in Chief
Wed Jan 3 00:59:24 PST 2007
This article clarfies where Tux Magazine ended up, but also indicates
that the last issue was published in December 2006
On 12/16/06, Ilan Rabinovitch <email@example.com> wrote:
> On a side note, it looks like SSC is no longer in bussiness. According
> a press release on the site, Carlie Farchild took over Linux Journal
> and created BellTown Media. 
> I'm not 100% sure who has Tux and IT Garage now.
>  http://www.belltownmedia.com/node?from=1
> On 12/16/06, Greg Folkert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Mister Don Marti,
> > I sorely miss the just previous Linux Journal Editor in Chief.
> > Not that Nic is bad, just that the format and content has become more
> > "glossy", "for the n00b, and deadheads in management" and "not for the
> > Linux user in the trenches".
> > I haven't read the Linux Journal "Cover to Cover" for the last 7 months.
> > I just have a hard time finding the "Content". Then when I do, it is
> > mostly dumbed down. Though some articles and authors are very much the
> > same, I can see "steered editing and writing" rather than allowing a
> > freehand.
> > The amount of advertising is incredible (latest edition #153, has 7.3
> > pages and 2.7 Index/Masthead pages before *ANY* content), the magazine
> > is "wider" which has forced me to find different storage (I built a
> > cabinet for them, oversight on my part... yes). I'd consider the PDF
> > versions... but dam, I already pay for the Dead-Tree version and the
> > Dead-Tree version is produced electronically (in some form of publishing
> > program) that can output to PDF just as easily to DVI or PS or EPS or
> > maybe even (natively) Microsoft Word (.doc) or WHATEVER format.
> > It is a crying shame, me being an early subscriber, to be considering a
> > cancelling, no... not a non-re-subscriber --- a cancelling, as I almost
> > don't want it delivered anymore, period. I just renewed... for 2 years
> > out of habit. It is a shame really.
> > As far as Linuxworld, haven't brought myself to consistently read it
> > since it radically changed from whence it was raised... back when Nic
> > was cajoled (additionally, maybe sole reason?) into doing it by many of
> > us in the old old original Inforworld Electric Forums, before Infoworld
> > screwed them up with "new forum software".
> > Thoughts for SSC or Nic or Don? I have additional ones, but they could
> > be construed as hurtful and scathing. So I hesitate to offer them.
> > Sincerely considering my options.
> > --
> > greg, email@example.com
> > The technology that is
> > Stronger, better, faster: Linux
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-elitists mailing list
> > firstname.lastname@example.org
> > http://allium.zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists
More information about the linux-elitists