[linux-elitists] GPL Violations
Wed Jul 26 19:04:42 PDT 2006
On 26-Jul-2006, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Ben Finney (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> > They're copyrights, not property rights.
> A quibble too far: I did not say (nor mean) _natural_ property.
A distinction easily missed, and difficult to impart. So why not just
talk about copyright, instead of raising the "natural versus
kinda-not-really property" spectre at all?
\ "I went to a museum where all the artwork was done by children. |
`\ They had all the paintings up on refrigerators." -- Steven |
_o__) Wright |
Ben Finney <email@example.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20060727/de594831/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists