[linux-elitists] So, when is the Linux Journal gonna give up and finally
Tue Mar 29 12:36:00 PST 2005
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 09:41 -0800, Don Marti wrote:
> begin Greg Folkert quotation of Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:54:47AM -0500:
> > Release a service pack (content update?) to the CD-ROM Archive, I so
> > regularly use? I'd even be willing to buy the damn update as an ISO to
> > download.
> > So, Don, seeing how you maybe kinda have a little bit of influence...
> > well?
> Let's get the me having any influence thing out of the
> way first. Timing and format for the archive CD-ROM
> is the business side, and I'm on the editorial side.
> You wouldn't want ad-mongers picking articles,
> would you?
You can at least use clue-by-4 technology on them, at least brandish a
> Current subscribers can get web access to HTML
> versions of articles all the way up to the current
> issue, so if I didn't have a shell account on the LJ
> server I'd probably write a script to snarf, de-Flash,
> and archive the current issue and run it once a month.
> (Yes, LJ has started accepting Macromedia Flash ads.
> Now do you believe I have nothing to do with the
> business side?)
Yeah, yeah, I saw that. for shame.
> As long as we're on the subject of plugins,
> how do I get rid of the "additional plugins are
> required..." bar in Firefox without installing the
> actual plugin? I'd like a polite inoffensive plugin
> that just displays grey boxes where the puzzle pieces
> are now, and doesn't bug me.
Try a couple of extensions:
That blocks flash.
That one give a nicer interface to the about:config stuff.
Also, I use adblock: Somehow "ads.linuxjournal.com" got in the list to
block... and I can't seem to delete it. Curious. If your marketing
droids found out about adblock, they's hafta swap out the thar underwar.
> > 2002 is getting a bit far back for some of the trends we are seeing now
> > and we really need the reference from the "Source" to make sure the
> > Agents don't get the upper hand.
> The current archive CD goes up to 2003. Archive
> CDs come out every year, but by the time the CD
> comes out there are a few issues not on the CD,
> so it's always a little behind. But the archive
> CD does have the amazing jsFind "Cross-Platform
Coolio, Julio^W Don.
> > Or is that whole archive thing not flying well? I hope not, as I use
> > mine quite a lot. I even have it available to me on the web. (But in a
> > protected area, so as not to do the anal-IP-leakage, like Olestra(tm)
> > does).
> I've only found _one_ person hosting an infringing
> copy of an LJ archive CD. I sent him polite mail
> assuming it was a mistake in his Apache configuration,
> and he changed it to local-only the same day.
> Of course, the LJ authors tend to be accomodating
> free-software friendly types, so if you need an
> article to distribute with project docs you can always
> just ask the author.
See, I knew we weren't the lying/stealing/pirating (ARGH, Matey!) cheats
the RIAA and MPAA has us made out to be, no it is those darn 6 year olds
and their connivingly EVUL-take-over-the-music/film-industry plans.
The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster: Linux
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20050329/d1549f7d/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists