[linux-elitists] Ha ha Reply-To
Wed Mar 9 21:53:05 PST 2005
On 10-Mar-2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:28 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > If your reply is To the list, use the To field correctly. If the
> > person wants a Cc, they can indicate that with Mail-Followup-To.
> Ok, so I'm trying this out...
Not a great test, because:
> I will CC you, but send to the list to see if a person could request
> such a thing without having LE toss it's cookies.
- I dump duplicate messages, so I'll never know if your message to me
was also received by the list
> If the person receiving and the person sending wants this, but LE
> refuses to comply, I call that a bug. Or are users not allowed to
> comply with other users' requests?
- You're not complying with my request, because my Mail-Followup-To on
this list explicitly requests no copy to me.
However, others may be able to tell you if it worked in this case.
\ "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But |
`\ the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound |
_o__) truth." -- Niels Bohr |
Ben Finney <firstname.lastname@example.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20050310/00fcc864/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists