[linux-elitists] Ha ha Reply-To
Wed Mar 9 16:28:28 PST 2005
On 09-Mar-2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> PPS: If Linux-E is going to reject mail that is to a person and CCed
> to the list, then why isn't there a Reply-To header by default?
Reply-To is for the sender to indicate where individual replies should
go, not for the list software to munge.
Followups to the list shouldn't use the Reply-To.
> It's really annoying having to change the recipients every time I
> reply to a Linux-E message or have the mail dropped on the floor by
> the list.
If your reply is To the list, use the To field correctly. If the person
wants a Cc, they can indicate that with Mail-Followup-To.
\ "Somebody told me how frightening it was how much topsoil we |
`\ are losing each year, but I told that story around the campfire |
_o__) and nobody got scared." -- Jack Handey |
Ben Finney <firstname.lastname@example.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20050310/3005a513/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists