[linux-elitists] Virtualization
Mike MacCana
mmaccana@redhat.com
Wed Feb 23 14:49:58 PST 2005
Martin Pool wrote:
>On 23 Feb 2005, "J. Paul Reed" <preed@sigkill.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>I mean the kernel modules that are necessary to load if you are using
>>>Linux as the host os. The ones that taint the kernel when loaded, and
>>>drive you all crazy with every new kernel release as the different
>>>kernel apis change all around you, with you all being helpless and
>>>constantly playing catch up. Quite fun to watch if you ask me.
>>>
>>>
>>Ahh... and Xen is different how? Oh right... they just modify the whole
>>damn kernel (and require you to patch your entire kernel every rev).
>>
>>The fact of the matter is, if you're not running a virtualization platform
>>(a la ESX), and you're running a "hosted" virtualization product, you have
>>to do this. UML does it. Xen does it. VMware does it.
>>
>>
>
>qemu doesn't require kernel modules, though apparently it does suffer
>a performance hit as a result of being able to use less of the MMU.
>
>
From what I've read, it's a 5x performance hit if you don't use the
QEmu modules tho.
Mike
More information about the linux-elitists
mailing list