[linux-elitists] apropos of nothing
Thu Aug 4 07:12:22 PDT 2005
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 08:30 -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 20:15, Modus Operandi wrote:
> > Intuitively, I suppose that apt-get is installing a working binary,
> > while CPAN is trying to build the Perl module from sources (and
> > sometimes hanging up on some dependencies along the way.) But it
> > would be nice to know for sure, instead of just guessing.
> That's right. Installing from CPAN is akin to installing some random source
> tarball. Just say no.
> We in the RPM world are blessed with cpan2rpm, which makes keeping the
> compiled-from-source stuff to a minimum a lot easier. Take that, Debian
Ever heard of "dh-make-perl"?
Far, far better implementation than that cpan2rpm crap you call making
The best part of this whole story, is that *IF* someone DOES decide to
upload a module or set of modules to the Debian archive, the package
made by dh-make-perl will be upgraded as well, providing it is newer in
its version... or even sub-version.
Now, what was that about Debian Hippies? If you don't use it and don't
understand it, please in all respects, don't resort to name calling...
you RPM-FACIST! And yes, I use rpm. I am currently still supporting many
systems that use rpm as the primary means for package
By pseudo, package management is all about quality control. How many RPM
distributions have POLICY behind package management and redundancy?
Policy requiring many check by satisfied, specifically about how
compliant it must be to be included, what changes must be done to allow
I knew of only one, but that now has gone by the wayside.
Have a nice day, Simon.
For technology that is
Strong, Better, Faster: Linux
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20050804/266b41f1/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists