Mozilla/Firefox issues rant (was Re: [linux-elitists] Browser plugins and write permissions)
Karsten M. Self
Thu Nov 25 15:56:16 PST 2004
on Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:09:37AM -0800, Don Marti (email@example.com) wrote:
> begin Karsten M. Self quotation of Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 04:46:12AM -0800:
> > Mozilla's file-based configuration makes such manipulations slightly
> > less convenient. The use of distinctly-named configuration
> > directories (there's an arbitrary character string in the directory
> > path name) makes even automated querying and changing of values
> > slightly more complicated.
> It would be nice if Firefox would just use GConf where available.
Irony noted, but yes, a fair gripe.
Simply parking config files in a readily determinable location, *and*
not proliferating same arbitrarially, would also be nice.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
After a storm comes a calm.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20041125/2591f6ed/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists