Mozilla/Firefox issues rant (was Re: [linux-elitists] Browser plugins and write permissions)

Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com
Thu Nov 25 15:56:16 PST 2004


on Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:09:37AM -0800, Don Marti (dmarti@zgp.org) wrote:
> begin  Karsten M. Self quotation of Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 04:46:12AM -0800:
> 
> >     Mozilla's file-based configuration makes such manipulations slightly
> >     less convenient.  The use of distinctly-named configuration
> >     directories (there's an arbitrary character string in the directory
> >     path name) makes even automated querying and changing of values
> >     slightly more complicated.
> 
> It would be nice if Firefox would just use GConf where available.

Irony noted, but yes, a fair gripe.

Simply parking config files in a readily determinable location, *and*
not proliferating same arbitrarially, would also be nice.


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    After a storm comes a calm.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20041125/2591f6ed/attachment.pgp 


More information about the linux-elitists mailing list