[linux-elitists] Stable distro kernel rant

Peter Whysall peter@whysall.net
Tue Jan 27 06:23:36 PST 2004


on Tue, Jan 27, 2004, Rick Moen (rick@linuxmafia.com) wrote:

> ...then it was at best utterly non-sequitur to the preceding discussion,
> since neither I nor anyone else had spoken of 2.5.x kernels, but rather
> later-then-2.4.18-type 2.4.x ones.  

Good God, man! If you're going to fling it around as some kind of
argumentative device at every available opportunity, then at LEAST have
the decency to spell "non sequitur" properly! 

There is no hyphen in "non sequitur".

What the FUCK kind of elitist are you? The illiterate colonial baboon kind?

Gah!

P.

-- 
peter@whysall.net
The IWETHEY project: http://www.iwethey.org
Collaborative Media Foundation: http://collaborativemedia.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040127/01198916/attachment.pgp 


More information about the linux-elitists mailing list