[linux-elitists] Stable distro kernel rant
Sun Jan 25 18:13:41 PST 2004
Quoting Jason Spence (email@example.com):
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:59:22AM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> > > Remember what started this thread? Someone complained that their kernel
> > > did not support their latest devices. These devices weren't even
> > > available when the 2.4.18 kernel was released. So how that person
> > > expected their 2 year old kernel to support their month old device is
> > > beyond me...
> Actually, Adam was looking for hardware and I was bitching about
> out-of-the-box distribution support for said hardware.
I believe you accidentally snipped Greg KH's attribution line, in the
> Some people made very convincing arguments that running development
> kernels may not be such a bad thing, and that the dip may not have
> been so bad this release cycle....
Indeed, generalising from the plainly broken situation that gave rise to
early 2.4.x kernels would (obviously) be dumb.
> ...so running the bleeding-edge may be a valid solution to this
> problem for many people.
Maybe it's just me, but calling 2.4.24 "bleeding edge" strikes me as
exaggeration to the point of polemics.
> The thing I was complaining about was not that it was impossible to
> run more recent kernels on debian-stable or another branch lacking the
> latest kernel package in its pool, but rather that porting the
> packages may be an excessive overhead for one site that I maintain.
> The fact that make-kpkg isn't exactly the friendliest tool in the
> world also increases the difficulty of the task.
I'm not quite sure what to make of this. Are you perhaps trying to pull
our legs? Compiling a kernel using only the kernel tarball and its
README isn't really brain-surgery, and make-kpkg makes that slightly
more automated and easier (as well as inserting a entry into the package
database) -- but I suppose you could do without that creature-comfort if
for some bizarre reason you found it too difficult.
Cheers, "By reading this sentence, you agree to be bound by the
Rick Moen terms of the Internet Protocol, version 4, or, at your
firstname.lastname@example.org option, any later version." -- Seth David Schoen
More information about the linux-elitists