[linux-elitists] Re: are cursed IPs contagious?
Thu Jan 22 10:40:50 PST 2004
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:09:58PM -0500, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> If your 'remailer' (?) is using confirmed opt-in or is otherwise
> guaranteed not to be forwarding spam, then you're cool.
Spammers do use anonymous remailers, though probably not too many (not too
many know how to create a properly formattted message).
There's a valid abuse address and a simple method to block
(block-destination) to prevent harassment from that egress point, though
I haven't looked at what gets delivered, but there's been a high worm/virus
load on the address, which imo was clearly malicious in intent. I blocked all
Windows executables at MTA level, and the problem has gone away.
> If you act on abuse complaints, you'll probably stay off blocklists,
> though every administrator has different rules.
I don't mind if the second IP gets blacklisted. It's in the nature of the
thing. What I'm wondering is whether there's a way of telling that the IP is
bound to an interface also hosting another IP.
> If you actually are spamming, and you continue -- or, more to the
> point, if the blocklist maintainers *believe* you are spamming -- your
> listing will likely escalate quickly to include not only yourself but
> also other people using the IP blocks belonging to your ISP; at that
> point your ISP, having failed to eject a known spammer, will have
> become a spam-support operation.
We'll see as this goes, I can always go middleman. I just got tired of
visible load on my ADSL line, which is in DUL anyway.
-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040122/c7521a63/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists