[linux-elitists] GNOME report.
Thu Jan 8 00:18:33 PST 2004
<quote who="Jim Richardson">
> > Please suggest this in bugzilla.
> Ok, how do I do that? (Feel free to say rtfm, provided you show me where
> the fm is :)
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ or just run bug-buddy for a less fascist
experience (*cough* Nick *cough*).
> > > System is a bit "sluggish" compared to WindowMaker, but that's to be
> > > expected, and it's not as bad as I feared, or as bad as it was a few revs
> > > ago.
> > Great!
> probably sawfish stuff ;)
Haw haw. ;-)
> > Metacity is even better in this respect - and can actually be built without
> > a lot of GNOME stuff for almost-embedded use - but I'm not sure if you'd be
> > satisfied by its default behaviour and preferences.
> Are they much different from Sawfish?
There are like, seven visible preferences or something.
> I'd switch to metacity if that made any diff. I am not stuck on sawfish,
> with the caveats of the above stuff, it does what a WM should do, fade
> into the background.
Yeah, we hope so.
killall sawfish; metacity &
Then, when you quit GNOME, save your session. Then metacity will always
start. Optionally, you can futz around with Debian alternatives and stuff.
Come to gnome.conf.au 2004! http://www.gnome.org/~jdub/2004/gnome.conf.au/
If Perl is gaffer, and Python is Magic Tape, then Ruby is self-adhesive
More information about the linux-elitists