WMaker as a golden mean (was Re: [linux-elitists] Re: GNOME > you)

Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com
Mon Jan 5 23:20:49 PST 2004

on Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:16:53PM -0800, Jim Richardson (warlock@eskimo.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:48:38PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> ><quote who="Karsten M. Self">
> >
> >>...or Jim could just cut to the chase and run WMaker under GNOME.
> >
> >Of course. But Jim is testing GNOME here, so helping him with GNOME is what
> >I'm doing.
> >
> >>I think it still has support for this.
> >>
> >>For a time, WMaker was the only WM I knew of which was _both_ GNOME
> >>*and* KDE aware.  Though I haven't followed developments.
> >
> >WMaker is NETWM aware these days.
> What the heck is NETWM? 

What WMaker is aware of.



Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    The truth behind the H-1B IT indentured servant scam:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040105/f680655b/attachment.pgp 

More information about the linux-elitists mailing list