[linux-elitists] Re: GNOME > you
Karsten M. Self
Mon Jan 5 19:26:05 PST 2004
on Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:49:20AM +1100, Jeff Waugh (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> <quote who="Adam Sampson">
> > > I think it would be pretty unkind to have window-snapping on by
> > > default,
> > Why's that? It seems to me like a usability plus -- having things
> > lined up is good, and things like Nautilus automatically line up icons
> > by default, so what's wrong with having the window manager line up
> > windows by default?
> I think it's the pinball-machine effect. Imagine if there was an audible
> "bonk!" every time the window snapped. That's how some people perceive
> effects like that.
I think it's the personal preferences thing.
My WM (wmaker) snaps windows when they're within a definable distance of
a boundary (other windows, edges of screen). I can enable or disable
the behavior. And I find it useful.
Karsten M. Self <email@example.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Backgrounder on the Caldera/SCO vs. IBM and Linux dispute.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040105/5ee9aab4/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists