[linux-elitists] Re: GNOME > you
Sat Jan 3 12:00:19 PST 2004
Jeff Waugh <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> <quote who="Jeremy Hankins">
>> Short version: I'm asking you to provide a more objective and less
>> psychological basis for the distinction between how & what than what
>> I described. Unless you can do that I'm forced to conclude that your
>> position is circular, because you're defending the choice of idiom by
>> reference to the choice of idiom.
> You are being pointlessly abstract. When you come back to Earth,
> hopefully with reference to the initial examples, let me know.
Not gonna happen -- if by "back to Earth" you mean mired in minutiae. I
really don't care about gnome, except as it's a focal point of some
wrong-headed and disturbing trends in UI. Any discussion about the
particularities of gnome would be irrelevant. And I wouldn't be able to
participate effectively because I don't know gnome. No problem, because
that's not a conversation I care about. The fact that you keep going
back to "But users don't *_CARE_*" is what I find interesting.
But if you're only interested in trees there's no point in talking about
Jeremy Hankins <email@example.com>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03
More information about the linux-elitists