CC considered harmful (was Re: [linux-elitists] [RANT] Debian the Elitist Distribution?)
Karsten M. Self
Mon Feb 23 00:09:18 PST 2004
on Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:44:08PM +1100, Mike MacCana (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:53:53PM -0800, Jim Thompson (email@example.com) wrote:
> > Jim: would you and Mike please remove me from your CC lists.
> Will do.
> > Mike: this is among the reason CC's are annoying as hell: they
> > propogate.
> Tell that to people who are on list digests, or tired or waiting for slow
> list servers.
Specious: Of which you're doing neither.
I've dropped lists for precisely those (and other) broken practices. If
I can't thread topics and reasonably associate replies with posts, and
attributions and quoting are both broken and beyond all reason, I'll
The Pho List and SAS-L are two standouts on both points. I've bailed
CNI-Copyright specifically repaired broken headers at my request, I
continue to subscribe.
Seems to me someone let the clue out of l-e in the past few weeks. Time
for uncle Don to play (or find a) bad cop IMO.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Backgrounder on the Caldera/SCO vs. IBM and Linux dispute.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040223/d3743e33/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists