[linux-elitists] [RANT] Debian the Elitist Distribution?

Jim Richardson warlock@eskimo.com
Sun Feb 15 21:02:11 PST 2004


On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 02:59:02PM +1100, Mike MacCana wrote:
>On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Jim Richardson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 01:15:30PM +1100, Mike MacCana wrote:
>> >On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Greg Folkert wrote:
>> >
>> >> Reason being, it is the distribution where every architecture (11
>> >> officially supported right now) is treated the same. Can you say that
>> >> about Mandrake, RedHat, Gentoo?
>> >
>> >Yes. Red Hat supports seven architectures. Its not eleven, but to be
>> >honest, I don't give a fuck about installing Linux on my Atari.
>> >
>> >The architecture thing is pretty much a myth.
>> >
>>
>> Being something that you aren't interested in, doesn¸t make it a myth.
>
>I know. But 'Red Hat Linux is intel exclusive' clearly is.
>

Agreed. 

-- 
Jim Richardson     http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word.
	-- Lazarus Long
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040215/eed17dfa/attachment.pgp 


More information about the linux-elitists mailing list