[linux-elitists] [RANT] Debian the Elitist Distribution?

Greg Folkert greg@gregfolkert.net
Sun Feb 15 19:37:05 PST 2004

On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 21:15, Mike MacCana wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Reason being, it is the distribution where every architecture (11
> > officially supported right now) is treated the same. Can you say that
> > about Mandrake, RedHat, Gentoo?
> Yes. Red Hat supports seven architectures. Its not eleven, but to be
> honest, I don't give a fuck about installing Linux on my Atari.
> The architecture thing is pretty much a myth.
Superciliousness is quite obvious... 31337 evidence... PASS.

And BTW, I meant *CURRENTLY* supporting those architectures, not past
tense or unofficially. It DOES make a difference.

BTW, I give a fuck about those architectures. I use about 5 of them you
probably never HAVE used. Stay in your Intel world. Stay the fuck out of
any arch that really works, you'll just get in the way.
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net
REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040215/b7eb4c28/attachment.pgp 

More information about the linux-elitists mailing list