Postfix anti-antivirus (was Re: [linux-elitists] procmail recipe for mydoom?)
Tue Feb 10 20:04:10 PST 2004
On 11-Feb-2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Ben Finney">
> > Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > > amavis, spamassassin, and other similar tools.
> > So, if one of the Postfix processes was making content-based reject
> > decisions during SMTP, it would not be an "external process" in that
> > sense?
> Queued, man, queued.
Let's try again:
You define an "external process" during the SMTP session as "amavis,
spamassassin, and other similar tools".
If Postfix used a Postfix process to determine rejection of the message
at SMTP time, would that be an "external process"?
\ "I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono |
`\ album; no rhyme or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and |
_o__) then it's over." -- Ian Wolff |
Ben Finney <firstname.lastname@example.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040211/0709841d/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists