[linux-elitists] Re: Postfix anti-antivirs
Tue Feb 10 19:03:09 PST 2004
On 11 Feb 2004, Ben Finney <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 11-Feb-2004, Martin Pool wrote:
> > On 11 Feb 2004, Phil Mayers <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > So *I* am supposed to absorb the spam to help firstname.lastname@example.org.
> > example.com never did anything to you.
> Likewise, Phil (as destination) is doing nothing to example.com.
> The MTA attempting to pass malware on to the destination may fall back
> to a bounce message, but the responsibility for that lies squarely with
> the relaying MTA, *not* with the destination.
I didn't say the garbage was Phil's responsibility or his fault.
I just said that it would be very kind of him to do this little thing
to reduce the amount of garbage ending up at example.com. If he
filters after receipt, it will have that effect.
It does not require him to read the garbage and it does not impede his
ability to lart the relay and it does not increase the chance of false
positives. It is just a nice thing he can do to reduce the amount of
noise that does not cost him anything.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040211/6285c69a/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists