Postfix anti-antivirus (was Re: [linux-elitists] procmail recipe for mydoom?)
Tue Feb 10 16:09:58 PST 2004
On 11-Feb-2004, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2004, Ben Finney <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Or, better, the recipients of the bounce messages can pressure the
> > smarthost to stop accepting the malware in the first place.
> Why doesn't the person at the destination address do that? Why shift
> the work onto the person whose address was forged?
The destination has already reacted exactly the way the relay MTA should
have: by rejecting the message at SMTP time. The work is not being
shifted by the destination, but *by the relay*.
\ "If you ever fall off the Sears Tower, just go real limp, |
`\ because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will try to |
_o__) catch you because, hey, free dummy." -- Jack Handey |
Ben Finney <firstname.lastname@example.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040211/b9cfc9ea/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists