Postfix anti-antivirus (was Re: [linux-elitists] procmail recipe for mydoom?)
Karsten M. Self
Mon Feb 2 00:29:50 PST 2004
on Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:27:35PM +1100, Tim Potter (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:19:05PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:04:24AM -0500, James Morris (email@example.com) wrote:
> > > Does anyone have a good one?
> > Related topic. Link is a list of postfix reject rules for AV spam
> > headers. The anti-antivirus.
> > http://www.t29.dk/antiantivirus.txt
> That's nice but generating an automatic message in respond to an
> automatic message doesn't help the problem.
> sed 's/REJECT.*/DISCARD/'
Is that a reject _mail_ or a 5XX reject _message_?
If the latter: it spreads clue. Whether the clue sticks is another
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Rules of Spam: #3: Spammers are stupid.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040202/8ec53c12/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists