[linux-elitists] 1 Gb e-mail mailboxes?
Karsten M. Self
Mon Apr 5 14:33:20 PDT 2004
on Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:03:43AM -0700, Don Marti (email@example.com) wrote:
> begin Eugen Leitl quotation of Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:19:00PM +0200:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:11:50PM +0200, wuonm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > for all e-mail admins out there...how can Google offer such huge inbox size and still pretend to earn some money?
> > http://blog.topix.net/archives/000016.html
> That URL is right about Google operations. One of the biggest trade
> secrets Google has today is their reliability stats on PC-architecture
> hardware. How much would _you_ (get your employer to) pay for
> Google's report on drive failures by brand and model?
This I buy. That blog is one of the more fascinating things I've read
in quite a while.
> But how can you afford to give users 1GB mailboxes...well, web-based
> email services are just big spam antennas. You can run the service at
> a loss -- the real value is in charging for the right to query the
> tremendous real-time IP address shitlist it gives you. Starting a
> web-based email service today is a bet on the intractability of the
> spam problem.
IMVAO this is a hopelessly overengineered approach to the spam problem.
With intelligent treatment of data it's possible to get a handle on spam
with a far smaller investment. And for proper honeypotting, you'd want
to scatter your pots widely, not cluster them in one space. Physical or
I don't buy it.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Windows Refund Day II: fight for your right to refund
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20040405/2e34548c/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists