Mon Sep 22 13:28:02 PDT 2003
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 15:36, George Georgalis wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> First off, apologies for the tmda confirm requests some of you have
> I installed tmda this weekend and all seems okay, accept some
> linux-elitist posts.
> The (envelope) Return-Path field is
> one of my incoming filter rules is
> to-file ~/.tmda/lists/whitelist_to ok
> the whitelist file contains
> I've also used an incoming filter rule
> from-file ~/.tmda/lists/whitelist_from ok
> which also contains
> still, some posts are not matching the tmda whitelist and showing like
> this in the log....
> Date: Mon Sep 22 13:41:44 EDT 2003
> Sndr: email@example.com
> From: Ari Jort <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: email@example.com
> Subj: Re: [linux-elitists] Swen
> Actn: CONFIRM pending 1064252503.12096.msg (1085)
> Can anyone give me a clue why?
Yeap... it's malware, shifting the burden off proving who you are from
spoofed headers. Wrong, Wrong, Wrong Wrong. Challenge and Response
setups are sick. And cause as much e-mail to combat spam and virii as it
apt-get remove --purge tmda
Is the ONLY SANE answer. C-R systems push the burden off to unsuspecting
other third parties not even connected to most of the mail sent this
way. Any C-R I get goto /dev/null.
REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry
Were giraffe's antennae to sprout from your barnacled elbows, one could
but weep for the pretense of a fallen chamber pot.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20030922/c3e37fcb/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists