Mon Sep 22 13:02:20 PDT 2003
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
> > > > On the contrary; if you block the message at the SMTP level, the
> > > > sender gets an error. The blocking error message should include
> > > > something intelligible on why the message was rejected, and the
> > > > sender can fix that problem with their message and resend.
> > >
> > > You assume 1) the sender is valid and 2) the sender is the address
> > > of the responsible party. Neither of these are necessarily the case
> > > for virus type spam.
> > You call yourself an elitist, and you don't even know what really
> > happens when you reject email at the SMTP level?
**** inserted to protect the innocent.
> Return-Path: <*****@inwind.it>
>Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
> by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h8MJt8c19383
> for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:55:08 -0400
>Received: from smtp3.libero.it (smtp3.libero.it [22.214.171.124])
> by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h8MJt6111029
> for <email@example.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:55:06 -0400
>Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:55:06 -0400
>Received: from fbzu (126.96.36.199) by smtp3.libero.it (7.0.020-DD01)
> id 3F6F04A60003F488; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:54:39 +0200
>FROM: "MS Message System" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>TO: "Inet Client" <email@example.com>
> 1 Shown ~10 lines Text
> 2 109 KB Audio
smtp3.libero.it looks like a valid isp mail exchager to me.
Matthew Galgoci "If you were a woman I'd kiss you right now."
Red Hat, Inc
More information about the linux-elitists