[linux-elitists] Responents to challenge-response
Karsten M. Self
Sat Sep 13 21:57:20 PDT 2003
on Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 01:06:26PM +1000, Ben Finney (email@example.com) wrote:
> On 13-Sep-2003, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:10:15PM -0700, Nick Moffitt (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> > > E-mail whitelists have always been useless, since e-mail headers are
> > > inherently forgeable.
> > Amusing in that I'm writing an article on the faults of C-R
> > (challenge-response) as I read this.
> Haven't you already done so?
> Or is this something other than an "article"? I find it an excellent
> resource already, so I'm interested to know what more you're working on
> for this topic.
A work based in part on that rant, cleaned up a bit, with slightly more
background, and pitched slightly lower. Also incorporating reflections
based on arguing points over the Net for tte past several weeks.
But thanks for the compliments ;-)
Karsten M. Self <email@example.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Defeat EU Software Patents! http://swpat.ffii.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20030914/34a41b6e/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists