[linux-elitists] Re: Yet another mozilla atrocity
Tue Oct 14 21:20:19 PDT 2003
<quote who="Lance Simmons">
> * Jeff Waugh <email@example.com> [031014 20:56]:
> > Some posters seem to be equating documentation bugs with a fundamental
> > misbelief in *nix 'standards'.
> Would one be incorrect to infer from this remark that you believe not in
> unix standards, but rather merely in unix 'standards'? That fits the
> evidence available to readers of this list, but it would be nice to hear
> otherwise from you.
Oh, for god's sake. The issues raised have very little to do with standards.
Thus the quotes.
> > > [...] the argument on this list has gone almost entirely against you,
> > > and [...] your repeated non-responses have in no way helped your case.
> > *blink*
> "*blink*" strikes me as simply one more in a long series of non-responses.
> What do you make of "*blink*" as a contribution to a civilized discussion
Your question was more of a statement than an investigation.
> > > Please respond in detail to the many good people on this list who have
> > > noticed that you have disconnected yourself from the UNIX heritage.
> > We have documentation bugs, and welcome contributions.
> That's it? Seriously, _that's it_?
To the manpages issue, sure.
linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
"People who paid for bug fixes in the 3c501 driver also bought MacIIfx
support contracts..." - Alan Cox
More information about the linux-elitists