[linux-elitists] Re: Yet another mozilla atrocity

Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com
Thu Oct 9 17:27:00 PDT 2003

on Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:21:48PM +1000, Ben Finney (ben@benfinney.id.au) wrote:
> On 09-Oct-2003, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Any idea _why_ we've got hex encoding rather than ASCII values [in the
> > XML file]?
> At a guess, presumably it's to get around character-set limits of the
> XML format chosen.  If so, it's not a very good reason, since XML should
> usually be UTF-8, allowing any currently-used character to be stored
> directly in the file.
> Which may mean that a bad decision was made, or may mean that my guess
> is wrong.

I was thinking about that.  Likely Unicode / large characterset issues.
What are the XML limitations on this?

> -- 
>  \     "He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let |
>   `\           that fool you. He really is an idiot."  -- Groucho Marx |
> _o__)                                                                  |
> Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>

Um...Why do you have a nose in your sig?  ;-)


Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    user-agent considered harmful.  Encourage W3M standards:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20031010/15aa85cf/attachment.pgp 

More information about the linux-elitists mailing list