[linux-elitists] Re: Yet another mozilla atrocity
Karsten M. Self
Thu Oct 9 02:48:51 PDT 2003
on Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:02:28AM +1000, Martin Pool (email@example.com) wrote:
> The few packages such as TeX which people do mention as being
> "bug"-free typically have the kind of complexity and quirkiness which
> you criticize in gconf.
TeX is decidedly complex.
It's also eminently stable. Not from a reliability standpoint (though
there's that). But it's pretty much "complete" software -- there's no
appreciable development on it.
While this of itself may or may not be a good thing, the point remains
that GNOME is a complex system that does complex stuff, for a wide
range of users, _and_ it's changing radically at the same time.
I'll avoid using the term "recipie for disaster", but this tends to
confound the problem.
1. OK, so I didn't really ;-)
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
A guide to GNU/Linux backups:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20031009/1d319612/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists