[linux-elitists] (tmda) Re: Constraining Bogus challenges.
Fri Oct 3 13:14:12 PDT 2003
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:17:33PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> - It uses a broad range of metrics. Unlike virtually every other spam
> classifier or rejection system I'm aware of, SA covers: RBLs,
> Razor/known spam, content, context, message metadata, sender,
> recipient, associated history. It's highly adaptable. These to me
> are signs of software which _is_ fundamentally pointed in the right
By the way, what does it take for the stock configuration to mark
something as spam?
I get some very nasty recurring spams which get these results:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=5.0
Something tells me the Bayes weights are way too low by default.
bogofilter would have thrown that very quickly. However, I never get
false positives and don't want to start now. Has anyone found a good
More information about the linux-elitists